- Added 32 JSON metadata files for all AI coding tools - Generated 39 REST API endpoints for programmatic access - Created working examples in Python, JavaScript, and PowerShell - Set up GitHub Actions workflow for automated deployment - Enhanced README with comprehensive feature documentation - Added version comparison and automation tools - Updated 20+ documentation files - Ready for GitHub Pages deployment |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| claude-code-system-prompt.txt | ||
| claude-code-tools.json | ||
| README.md | ||
Claude Code
Type: CLI Tool (Terminal-based AI Assistant)
Availability: Free with Claude API access
Provider: Anthropic
Model: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 4 (latest)
📋 Overview
Claude Code is Anthropic's official terminal-based AI coding assistant. Features:
- Autonomous terminal agent
- Full file system access
- Bash command execution
- Multi-file editing
- Web search integration
- TODO/progress tracking
- AGENTS.md support
- Git workflow integration
Philosophy: Concise, action-oriented, autonomous
📂 Files in This Directory
System Prompts:
claude-code-system-prompt.txt- Complete system instructions
Tools:
claude-code-tools.json- Comprehensive tool definitions (20+ tools)
🔍 Source
- Provider: Anthropic
- Official Documentation: Part of Claude API
- Date Captured: October 2024 (latest update)
- Attribution: Anthropic PBC
🎯 Key Features
1. Extreme Conciseness
One of the most concise prompts analyzed:
"Be concise. Answer in 1-3 sentences. No preamble or postamble. After editing, just stop."
2. TODO System
Built-in progress tracking:
Tools: todo_write, todo_read
Workflow:
1. Plan: Create TODO list
2. Execute: Mark items in-progress
3. Complete: Mark done immediately
4. Report: User sees progress
3. AGENTS.md Pattern
Per-project context file:
AGENTS.md contains:
- Commands (npm test, npm run dev)
- Style preferences
- Project notes
- Custom instructions
4. Git Workflow
Structured commit process:
- Check status + diff in parallel
- Analyze changes + check for secrets
- Stage files
- Commit with formatted message
- Include attribution footer
5. Defensive Security Only
Strong security stance:
"IMPORTANT: Assist with defensive security tasks only. Refuse to create, modify, or improve code that may be used maliciously."
🛠️ Tool Architecture
Core Tools (20+):
File Operations:
- read_file, write_to_file, search_replace
- list_dir, glob (pattern matching)
Search:
- grep_search, semantic_search
- read_web_page (web search integration)
Execution:
- run_bash_command (with background mode)
Progress:
- todo_write, todo_read
Analysis:
- get_linting_diagnostics
Git:
- Via bash with structured workflow
Tool Design Principles:
- Minimal tool count (20 vs. 30+ in some tools)
- Clear separation of concerns
- Composable (tools combine well)
- Parallel-friendly (independent operations)
📊 Unique Patterns
1. No Explanatory Comments
Explicit instruction:
"IMPORTANT: DO NOT ADD ANY COMMENTS unless asked. Only add comments when: 1. User explicitly requests them, 2. Code is complex and requires context"
Rationale: AI can explain in chat, comments clutter code.
2. Verify Before Committing
Required checks:
- Analyze all staged changes
- Draft commit message
- Check for sensitive information
- Include co-author attribution
3. Parallel Execution Default
"Whenever possible, you should call the functions in parallel. If there is no strict dependency, you should call them in parallel."
Performance Impact: 3-10x faster task completion
4. Context from Multiple Sources
Intelligent context gathering:
- Direct file content
- Diagnostics/errors
- AGENTS.md (if exists)
- Web search (when needed)
- Codebase semantic search
🔐 Security Features
Comprehensive Security Instructions:
-
Never Log Secrets:
"Never introduce code that exposes or logs secrets and keys. Never commit secrets or keys to the repository."
-
Defensive Security Only:
- Security analysis: ✅ Allowed
- Vulnerability explanations: ✅ Allowed
- Exploit creation: ❌ Forbidden
- Malicious code: ❌ Forbidden
-
Git Security:
- Check for secrets before staging
- Review all changes before commit
- No force push without explicit permission
-
Bash Command Safety:
"When you run a non-trivial bash command, you should explain what the command does and why you are running it."
💡 Best Practices Extracted
From Claude Code Prompts:
-
Conciseness is King:
- 1-3 sentence responses
- No preamble or postamble
- Stop immediately after task completion
-
TODO Transparency:
- Create plan before starting
- Mark in-progress before work
- Complete immediately after finishing
- Give user visibility
-
Parallel by Default:
- Independent operations run simultaneously
- Serialize only when necessary
- 3-10x performance improvement
-
No Code Comments:
- Explain in chat, not in code
- Only add when explicitly requested
- Keep code clean
-
Read Before Edit:
- Always read file first
- Understand context
- Make informed changes
-
Verify Changes:
- Check after editing
- Run tests when applicable
- Ensure success
-
Fail Fast:
- If same error persists, stop after 3 attempts
- Ask user for guidance
- Don't loop indefinitely
🎯 Comparison to Other Tools
vs. Cursor:
- Claude Code: Terminal-first, CLI tool
- Cursor: Visual IDE, GUI-focused
vs. GitHub Copilot:
- Claude Code: Autonomous agent, multi-file
- Copilot: Inline completions, autocomplete
vs. Windsurf:
- Claude Code: More mature, simpler architecture
- Windsurf: Cascade architecture, newer patterns
vs. Devin:
- Claude Code: Developer tool, terminal-based
- Devin: Autonomous developer, full project ownership
📈 Evolution & Updates
Observable Changes:
- October 2024: Latest captured version
- Increased emphasis on conciseness
- TODO system maturity
- Git workflow refinement
- Security instructions expanded
Future Directions:
- Likely continued conciseness optimization
- More tool additions
- Better context management
- Enhanced parallel execution
🎓 Learning Resources
From Claude Code:
Prompt Engineering:
- How to achieve extreme conciseness
- Tool architecture for parallel execution
- Security instruction design
- TODO/progress tracking patterns
Software Engineering:
- Git workflow best practices
- Code review patterns
- Testing strategies
- Security-first development
AI Design:
- Multi-tool orchestration
- Context management
- Error handling
- User communication
📊 Key Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Total Tools | 20+ |
| Prompt Length | ~15,000 tokens |
| Response Target | 1-3 sentences |
| Parallel Execution | Default |
| Security Rules | 10+ explicit |
| Git Commands | Structured workflow |
🔍 Technical Deep Dive
Tool Definitions (claude-code-tools.json):
Example: read_file
{
"name": "read_file",
"description": "Read the contents of a file",
"input_schema": {
"type": "object",
"properties": {
"path": {
"type": "string",
"description": "The absolute path to the file"
}
},
"required": ["path"]
}
}
Design Principles:
- Clear descriptions
- Explicit parameter types
- Required vs. optional fields
- Absolute paths (no ambiguity)
🎯 Use Cases
Ideal For:
- Terminal-based workflows (developers who live in CLI)
- Multi-file refactoring (autonomous agent handles complexity)
- Git-heavy workflows (structured commit process)
- Security-sensitive projects (defensive security only)
- Quick iterations (extreme conciseness = fast responses)
Not Ideal For:
- Visual debugging (no GUI)
- Beginners (terminal-focused)
- Windows users (bash-centric, though adaptable)
🌍 Impact & Influence
Claude Code's Influence on Other Tools:
-
TODO System:
- Adopted by Amp, Windsurf
- Now a standard pattern
-
AGENTS.md:
- Spreading across tools
- Becoming de facto standard
-
Conciseness Mandate:
- Influenced Cursor, others
- Token economics driving design
-
No Comments Philosophy:
- Controversial but spreading
- AI explanations > code comments
-
Parallel Execution:
- Performance insight
- Now emphasized in many tools
📚 Academic Interest
Research Topics:
-
Conciseness in AI Assistants:
- Impact on user experience
- Token cost savings
- Information density
-
Multi-Tool Orchestration:
- Parallel vs. serial execution
- Performance benchmarks
- Tool dependency graphs
-
Security in AI Assistants:
- Defensive security only approach
- Secret detection patterns
- Malicious use prevention
-
Context Management:
- AGENTS.md pattern effectiveness
- Long-term memory vs. per-project context
- Optimal context size
🔗 Related Resources
- Anthropic Documentation: https://docs.anthropic.com
- Claude API: https://console.anthropic.com
- Community: https://discord.gg/anthropic
- Research Papers: Anthropic publications on AI safety
🤝 Contributing
Found updates or improvements? See CONTRIBUTING.md
To Add:
- Newer versions of prompts
- Tool definition updates
- Usage examples
- Comparative analysis
⚖️ License & Attribution
Provider: Anthropic PBC
Documentation Purpose: Educational and research
Usage: These prompts are documented under fair use for:
- Understanding AI assistant design
- Comparative analysis
- Educational purposes
- Research
Source Attribution: Anthropic Claude Code
🙏 Acknowledgments
- Anthropic Team for Claude and Claude Code
- Community for sharing insights
- Contributors to this repository
📞 Contact
For questions about Claude Code specifically:
- Anthropic Support: support@anthropic.com
- Documentation: https://docs.anthropic.com
For this repository:
- Issues: GitHub Issues
- Discussions: GitHub Discussions
Last Updated: 2025-01-02
Claude Code Version: October 2024
README Version: 1.0